Which one you need depends on what you are actually being asked. Two of these are independent advisory work — we are paid to tell you the truth, including that you should not build something. The third is a build engagement, and it says so.
No implementation attached. The deliverable is the deliverable.
“Our examiner asked about AI governance and we have nothing written down.”
Chief Compliance Officer · Chief Risk Officer · Head of Financial Crimes
“We have nine pilots, no ROI answer, and the board meets in six weeks.”
CEO · CFO · Chief Digital Officer · board sponsor
A different kind of engagement, listed separately because it is not independent and should not pretend to be.
“We have decided to move. Scope the first deployment.”
Executive sponsor who has already chosen a direction
“I want to understand this before I spend anything.”
Anyone · no call required
Where the problem is specific enough that a general engagement would not reach it.
“The person who knew why we structured it that way retired last year.”
Single and multi-family offices · $500M–$5B+ under management
The honest comparison, including where the fee goes.
| Engagement | Fee | Duration | Independent? | Fee credited? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance Readiness exposure and documentation |
$7,500 | 3 weeks | Yes — no build attached | No |
| Investment Prioritization allocation and sequencing |
from $15,000 | 14 days | Yes — includes what to stop | No |
| Pilot Planning scope of a chosen build |
$12,500 | 3 weeks | No — this is our build path | Yes, in full |
| FamilyVault Intelligence family offices only |
$12,500–$25,000 | 3 weeks | Yes — assessment stands alone | No |