Compliance Native MiFID IIDORADodd-FrankBasel IIIEMIRMARSECGDPRSOC 2
Capital Markets Execution Stack

Capital Markets AI That
Executes Work.

T+1 ReportingTrade SurveillanceCounterparty RiskResearch

Governed, auditable AI agents working directly inside Bloomberg, your OMS, DWH, and regulatory portals. MiFID II T+1 submissions automated end-to-end. Counterparty risk re-scored in minutes, not hours. Zero missed reporting deadlines.

T+1Filing automated end-to-end
ZeroMissed reporting deadlines
8hrs→8secResearch brief generation
<90dContract to production
T+1
Regulatory filing automated
Zero
Missed reporting deadlines
65%
Decision cycle reduction
100%
Audit trail coverage
<90d
Contract to production

The Shift

What changes when CAIBots
files a T+1 report.

A standard MiFID II transaction report, before and after. Same trade data. Same ARM portal. Different execution model.

Before CAIBots
MiFID II T+1 — 847 equity trades, ARM submission due by 8:00 AM
Reporting analyst pulls trade blotter from OMS, begins field mapping — 25 minutes
Cross-references ISIN, LEI, and MIC codes for each counterparty — 30 minutes
Validates XML schema, flags 12 data quality exceptions for manual resolution — 20 minutes
Resolves exceptions, regenerates report, re-validates schema — 35 minutes
Submits to ARM portal, monitors for rejection codes, logs confirmation — 15 minutes
⏱ Total: ~2.1 hours — per reporting cycle, per analyst, at daily deadline risk
After CAIBots
Same 847 trades. CAIBots executes the full cycle overnight.
Trade data extracted from OMS, all fields mapped to MiFID II schema — automated
ISIN, LEI, and MIC cross-referenced against live reference data — automated
XML schema validated, exceptions identified and flagged with resolution recommendations — automated
Standard exceptions auto-resolved within tolerance rules, edge cases routed for analyst review — automated
ARM submission executed, confirmation logged to DWH, reporting officer notified — automated
✓ Total: Under 12 minutes — analyst reviews exceptions, not the full cycle
90%
Time reduction per reporting cycle
Zero
Missed T+1 deadlines on active deployments
100%
MiFID II Art. 26 compliant audit trail — every submission

Regulatory Reporting — Primary Execution Stack

Zero missed deadlines.
Every filing on time.

Regulatory reporting is where the largest operational risk exists for capital markets firms. CAIBots automates the full data-to-submission cycle — reporting teams review exceptions, not execute the process.

MiFID II T+1 Transaction ReportingMiFID II · ARM

T+1 transaction reporting executed automatically — data aggregation, field validation, XML generation, ARM submission, and exception flagging. Zero manual intervention for standard trades. FCA and ESMA reporting standards enforced at the architecture layer.

Trigger
T+1 cycle initiated — trade execution records ready for regulatory reporting
Cognition
Validate data completeness, classify reportable fields, identify LEI/ISIN gaps, generate XML with embedded decision rationale
Execution
ARM Portal submitted · DWH status logged · Outlook confirmation · Case Mgmt exception record
Output
Filed on timeZero manual stepsMiFID II compliant
EMIR Derivative Trade ReportingEMIR · Trade Repository

EMIR trade repository submissions generated and filed at T+1. Clearing obligation monitoring, margining requirement tracking, and direct submission to DTCC, REGIS-TR, or your nominated trade repository with full exception handling.

Trigger
Derivative execution confirmed — EMIR reportable trade identified
Cognition
Classify reportable fields, check clearing obligation, verify margining status, generate UTI, validate trade repository schema
Execution
Trade Repository report filed · DWH UTI logged · Risk System margin updated · Compliance DB record
Output
T+1 filedUTI generatedEMIR compliant
Counterparty Risk Re-ScoringBasel III · EMIR

Counterparty credit events trigger automatic risk re-scoring — live market data retrieval, CVA/DVA recalculation, exposure limit assessment, and breach routing for dual approval before any action executes. 48-hour process compressed to under 4 minutes.

Trigger
Credit event detected — counterparty rating downgrade or CDS spread movement
Cognition
Re-calculate CVA/DVA, assess exposure limit breach, classify remediation action, check EMIR margining requirements
Execution
Risk System updated · Bloomberg acknowledged · Salesforce RM notified · Approval breach routed
Output
Under 4 minBasel III CVA compliantDual approval gate
Trade Surveillance & Alert TriageMAR · Dodd-Frank · STOR

Real-time surveillance across trading activity — spoofing, layering, and wash trading pattern detection with automatic evidence brief generation and STOR pre-filing for high-confidence alerts. False positives auto-resolved without investigator time.

Trigger
Pattern anomaly flagged — spoofing signal detected in OMS order flow
Cognition
Classify pattern type, retrieve historical context, score MAR severity, assess STOR reporting threshold, generate evidence brief
Execution
Surveillance DB case created · Case Mgmt brief filed · Slack CCO alerted · RegTech STOR pre-filing
Output
Zero missed alertsFull evidence briefMAR compliant

Live Demo Paths

Watch a T+1 filing execute.
See counterparty risk close in 4 minutes.

Production-accurate scenarios. Live ARM portal submissions. Real MiFID II Art. 26 audit trails. Not a sandbox.

Demo 01
MiFID II T+1 — Trade Data to ARM Submission
1
Trade data extraction
OMS blotter pulled, all reportable fields identified and mapped
2
Reference data validation
ISIN, LEI, MIC codes cross-referenced, data quality gaps flagged
3
XML generation
MiFID II schema-compliant report generated, exceptions classified
4
ARM submission
Report submitted to ARM portal, confirmation receipt logged
5
Audit trail
MiFID II Art. 26 compliant record created. Reporting officer notified.
Demo 02
Counterparty Risk — Credit Event to Re-Scored Exposure
1
Credit event detected
Rating downgrade or CDS spread breach triggers re-scoring workflow
2
CVA/DVA recalculation
Live market data pulled from Bloomberg, Basel III CVA recalculated
3
Exposure limit check
Current exposure vs limit assessed, EMIR margining requirements verified
4
Risk system write
Updated exposure written to risk system, RM notified via Salesforce
5
Breach routing
Limit breach routed for CRO dual approval. Full Basel III audit record created.
Demo 03
Trade Surveillance — Alert to Evidence Brief
1
Alert generated
Surveillance system flags order pattern — spoofing or layering indicator
2
Pattern classification
Alert scored against MAR typology model, severity classified
3
Evidence assembly
Order history retrieved, timeline constructed, context added
4
STOR threshold check
MAR Art. 16 reporting obligation assessed, pre-filing initiated if required
5
Compliance review
Head of Compliance receives complete evidence file. MAR audit record created.

Start Here

30-day deployment
entry points.

MiFID II T+1 reporting first — the highest-risk manual process for most capital markets firms. Surveillance and counterparty risk follow with clear expansion paths.

Entry Point 1 — Reporting
MiFID II Reporting Automation

Start with T+1 transaction reporting — the highest-frequency, highest-deadline-risk process. Immediate compliance value with zero regulatory risk. Average 14–21 days to first live ARM submission with full audit trail.

Live in 14–21 days
Entry Point 2 — Surveillance
Trade Surveillance Alert Triage

Automate the alert triage queue — every surveillance flag classified, enriched with order context, and either auto-resolved or escalated with a full MAR evidence brief. Immediate reduction in analyst manual review time.

Live in 21–30 days
Entry Point 3 — Risk
Counterparty Monitoring Loop

Automate the daily counterparty credit event monitoring cycle. Every rating change, CDS move, and material news event processed and exposure re-scored without analyst intervention on standard monitoring workflows.

Live in 21–30 days

Agent Library

Pre-built capital markets
execution agents.

Every agent production-ready. Configures to your trading infrastructure, risk systems, and regulatory reporting pipelines in under 90 days.

Illustrative pricing shown. Ranges reflect typical deployments at mid-to-large investment banks and asset managers. Final pricing depends on trade volume, regulatory scope, systems integration complexity, and deployment model. Schedule a scoping call for a deployment-specific quote.
📈
TradeIQ™
End-to-end MiFID II T+1 regulatory reporting. Data aggregation, field validation, XML generation, ARM submission, and exception handling. Zero manual steps for standard trades. FCA and ESMA reporting compliant.
$5,000 – $12,000 / month
Typical deployment for investment banks and asset managers reporting 500–10,000 transactions daily across EU and UK markets.
Enterprise pricing scales by daily transaction volume, regulatory jurisdiction coverage, and ARM integration complexity.
🔭
SurveillanceAI™
Real-time trade surveillance for spoofing, layering, wash trading, and market manipulation patterns. MAR-compliant evidence briefs generated automatically. False positives scored and cleared without investigator time.
$4,000 – $8,000 / month
Typical deployment for trading desks with 200–2,000 daily alerts across equity, FX, and fixed income markets.
Enterprise pricing scales by alert volume, asset class coverage, and STOR pre-filing integration requirements.
⚖️
CounterpartyRisk™
Counterparty credit event monitoring with Basel III CVA/DVA recalculation, exposure limit management, and dual approval gates for limit breaches. 48-hour manual cycle compressed to under 4 minutes. EMIR margining included.
$5,000 – $10,000 / month
Typical deployment for prime brokers and trading firms with 50–500 active counterparty relationships requiring daily monitoring.
Enterprise pricing scales by counterparty count, asset class complexity, and risk system integration scope.
📋
ResearchAI™
Investment research brief generation from Bloomberg, Reuters, and proprietary data. 8 hours to 8.2 seconds per first draft. MiFID II analyst sign-off gate enforced. $960 per report reduced to $0.04. PM-ready output.
$3,000 – $6,000 / month
Typical deployment for asset managers and research teams producing 20–200 research events per month across portfolio holdings.
Enterprise pricing scales by event volume, data source integrations, and MiFID II compliance documentation requirements.
Pilot structure: Mid-market pilots start at $25K–$50K. Enterprise pilots at $50K–$150K. Includes workflow design, integration, governance setup, KPI baseline, and executive recommendation. 100% credited toward production deployment.
See Pilot Structure →

Compliance Architecture

FCA and ESMA examiner-ready.
Every execution.

For capital markets, compliance is not a documentation process. It is the execution boundary. Every workflow in the CAIBots CM stack operates within these frameworks by design — not configured post-deployment.

MiFID II
Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II

T+1 transaction reporting, best execution documentation, research unbundling records, and client communication logs — all generated automatically at the Execution Layer with MiFID II-compliant data structures and five-year retention.

Enforced at: Execution + Governance layers
DORA
Digital Operational Resilience Act

ICT risk management documentation, incident reporting workflows, and third-party risk monitoring — executed and logged at every step. DORA-compliant audit trails for all AI-driven decisions affecting trading operations.

Enforced at: Governance + Foundation layers
Dodd-Frank
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act

Swap dealer reporting, Volcker Rule compliance monitoring, and systemic risk flag detection. Consumer protection execution for retail-facing CM products automated with full regulatory record creation on every workflow.

Enforced at: Governance + Execution layers
Basel III / BCBS 239
Capital Adequacy · Risk Data Aggregation

CVA/DVA calculation execution, capital ratio monitoring, and stress testing data aggregation with BCBS 239-compliant lineage tracking. Every risk data write includes source, transformation logic, and timestamp.

Enforced at: Foundation + Execution layers
EMIR
European Market Infrastructure Regulation

Derivative trade reporting, clearing obligation monitoring, and margining requirement execution. EMIR trade repository submissions generated and filed at T+1 with full exception handling and audit trail.

Enforced at: Execution + Governance layers
MAR
Market Abuse Regulation

Suspicious transaction and order reporting (STOR), insider list management, and market manipulation detection — all executed with MAR-compliant evidence documentation and regulator-ready case files generated automatically.

Enforced at: Cognition + Governance layers

Governance Matrix

Every decision boundary
enforced at the architecture layer.

Deterministic execution — given the same trade data, the same report generates every time. An FCA or ESMA examiner can reproduce any execution from the audit record without pulling data from multiple systems.

WorkflowTriggerGovernanceAuth RequiredReg Reference
MiFID II T+1 — Standard TradeT+1 deadline · complete dataAuto-ExecuteNoneMiFID II Art. 26
MiFID II T+1 — Data ExceptionT+1 deadline · data gap detectedHITL GateReporting OfficerMiFID II Art. 26
Surveillance — Low AlertPattern flag · low severity scoreAuto-ResolveNoneMAR Art. 16
Surveillance — High AlertSpoofing / layering signal confirmedHITL GateHead of ComplianceMAR Art. 16 · STOR
Counterparty Risk — MonitoringDaily credit event monitoring cycleAuto-UpdateNoneBasel III · EMIR
Counterparty Risk — Limit BreachExposure limit breach detectedDual ApprovalCRO + Risk CommitteeEMIR · Basel III
Governance is not a documentation layer applied after deployment. It is the architecture that determines what can execute, how it executes, who must authorize it, and what gets logged. Review full governance architecture →

Built For

The teams who own
trading compliance.

Head of Regulatory Reporting
Investment Bank · Asset Manager
"MiFID II T+1 is consuming 8 analysts every morning. We've had two near-misses on deadline this quarter. The FCA does not accept 'we were delayed by a data quality issue' as a defense. I need this automated and defensible."
T+1 submission automated end-to-end — analysts review exceptions, not execute the full cycle
Every submission generates a MiFID II Art. 26-compliant audit record — FCA-exportable on demand
Deterministic execution — same trade data produces the same report every time, no drift
Zero missed deadlines on active deployments
Launch T+1 reporting demo →
Chief Risk Officer
Prime Broker · Trading Firm
"Our counterparty monitoring process runs 48 hours from event to exposure update. In a volatile market that is 48 hours of unmanaged risk sitting on my book. I need this measured in minutes, not days."
Credit events trigger re-scoring in under 4 minutes — Basel III CVA/DVA recalculated automatically
Exposure written to risk system immediately — no 48-hour lag between event and position update
Limit breaches routed for CRO dual approval before any action executes
Full observability — cost per risk decision, time from event to resolution, from day one
Launch counterparty risk demo →
Head of Compliance — Surveillance
Investment Bank · Broker-Dealer
"We generate 1,200 surveillance alerts per day. My team closes 92% of them as false positives after spending 20 minutes each. That is 22 analyst-hours per day on noise. I need better triage at the point of alert generation."
Alerts scored against MAR typology model at point of generation — false positives cleared automatically
High-confidence alerts escalated with complete evidence brief — investigators start immediately
STOR reporting threshold assessed automatically — pre-filing initiated without analyst intervention
MAR Art. 16-compliant evidence documentation on every alert regardless of outcome
Launch surveillance demo →
Head of Technology — Capital Markets
Investment Bank · FinTech
"We run Bloomberg, an internal OMS, SAP for finance, and a proprietary risk engine. The AI vendors I've seen build a fragile wrapper that breaks when our schema changes. I need something that actually integrates at the data layer."
Native API connectors to Bloomberg, Reuters, SAP, Oracle — no fragile screen-scraping or middleware
On-premise deployment — data never leaves your trading infrastructure boundary
Schema-aware connectors — data model changes handled at the Foundation Layer without workflow breakage
Five-layer architecture with full observability — your engineering team sees every execution step
Review the platform architecture →

Next Step

Watch a T+1 filing execute
in under 12 minutes.

30-minute session. We map your highest-value CM workflows, demonstrate a live MiFID II filing or surveillance execution, and scope a 90-day production path.

Princeton, NJ · contact@caibots.com · +1 (609) 721-2815
ComplianceMiFID IIDORADodd-FrankBasel IIIEMIRMARGDPREU AI ActSOC 2